FirewallNews

FortiGate FG-70G vs FG-70F vs FG-80F vs Palo Alto PA-460 vs Sophos XGS 136 — Mid-Range SMB Comparison 2026

The 70-series and 80-series serve 25-100 users. G-series vs F-series comparison with Palo Alto and Sophos equivalents. Based on official datasheets.

Spec Comparison — Official Datasheets

SpecFG-70GFG-70FFG-80FPA-460XGS 136
Firewall10 Gbps6 Gbps10 Gbps12.6 Gbps11.5 Gbps
IPS2.5 Gbps1.4 Gbps2.6 Gbps1.9 Gbps4 Gbps
NGFW1.5 Gbps1 Gbps1 Gbps (Threat)
Sessions1.4M1.5M1.5M1M
VPN7.1 Gbps6.1 Gbps6.5 Gbps3 Gbps4 Gbps

Official Datasheet References (downloaded PDFs):
FortiGate 30G Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 40F Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 100F Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto PA-400 Series Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto Enterprise Product Summary

FG-80F IPS is 2.6 Gbps per official Fortinet datasheet. XGS 136 firewall is 11.5 Gbps, IPS 4 Gbps, threat protection 1 Gbps per Sophos datasheet. All values “up to”.

The G-Series Advantage

FG-70G with FortiSP5 delivers 2.5 Gbps IPS — significantly better than the transitional FG-70F (1.4 Gbps). The FG-80F has the highest IPS in the F-series at this tier (2.6 Gbps). The FG-70F is a transitional model best avoided.

Palo Alto PA-460 vs Sophos XGS 136

PA-460: 12.6 Gbps firewall, 1.9 Gbps IPS. XGS 136: 11.5 Gbps firewall, 4 Gbps IPS (leading on IPS). FortiGate FG-80F: 2.6 Gbps IPS, 6.5 Gbps VPN — best VPN throughput in class.

Verdict

FG-70G for 25-50 users. FG-80F for 50-80 users needing 10 GE ports with higher IPS (2.6 Gbps). XGS 136 leads on raw IPS but Sophos threat protection is lower.

What's your reaction?

Related Posts